Les showed that rural
pressures create great risks and that's a consensus issue .
Because the Greens and major parties never study anything properly and haven't supported an objective research program they simply don't know what to do beyond that .
The danger is, though,that they will fall for any amount of new unproductive research.
Firstly they need to know who are participants and observers in this debate ,,,and then dismiss the outsiders .
The outsiders and name callers , for example, talk about resilience when they wouldn't know what a resilient ecosystem looked like . As said at start they create and perpetuate fear as a result of fear . Spinoza rightly said that fear is a companion of hope,so finding its right place is important ; These distant "would be doctors" will never know that - The ABC wouldn't even listen to them so much if they chased the right people RN .ie Bush telegraph .
Thankfully Les knows that, unlike the fearful kids whose minds weare contaminating with a glass half empty view of the world.. You can breed an alcoholic in the city just as easily as you breed one trying to grow grass. The grass grows in each paddock and no simple equation will tell you why one famaily thrives in poverty and abundance while another dives - attitude has a lot to do with it . Not so much nature and not so much " talking positively - a uniquely unsustainable approach cultivated by those on the drip fed from the taxpayer ) . What the farm will tell you each year , though if you stick with it is that sun and rain will come again forgiving the past and making a new start; not only possible but often highly productive to boot .Comes and goes like positive and negative , anger and joy , mental stress and mental relief . Maybe it isn't a an illness as the specialist on Q&A said.
Let noone say the natural world is limited without saying at the same time its most limited by the minds of men . I have published on this issue as a professional environmental risk assessor.
Recommendations to the ABC
--Was great that the ABC have got this right --- they need to get out of the way and let people talk
--The ABC and the Project are great at finding problems to talk about but they are really shit at offering solutions .Too many reporters like the thrill of naming them instead of linking. The Project is much better at it than the ABc and that's saying something . As I said to Jon Feine over ten years ago with his listeners;link us to each other and then you wouldn't create so much unresolved mental stress ( creates it by playing with the subject like Tony Jones does )
-- Programs like Bush telegraph need people with real experience and understanding of rural people . Its easy to feed lollies when mental issues require you to be aware of the medicine even if you aren't the ones to apply it - you might even invite guests like Les who hold a balance that really helps and don't dissect the person into a million broken pieces ( the legacy of those who practice at the school of mere description )
Because the Greens and major parties never study anything properly and haven't supported an objective research program they simply don't know what to do beyond that .
The danger is, though,that they will fall for any amount of new unproductive research.
Firstly they need to know who are participants and observers in this debate ,,,and then dismiss the outsiders .
The outsiders and name callers , for example, talk about resilience when they wouldn't know what a resilient ecosystem looked like . As said at start they create and perpetuate fear as a result of fear . Spinoza rightly said that fear is a companion of hope,so finding its right place is important ; These distant "would be doctors" will never know that - The ABC wouldn't even listen to them so much if they chased the right people RN .ie Bush telegraph .
Thankfully Les knows that, unlike the fearful kids whose minds weare contaminating with a glass half empty view of the world.. You can breed an alcoholic in the city just as easily as you breed one trying to grow grass. The grass grows in each paddock and no simple equation will tell you why one famaily thrives in poverty and abundance while another dives - attitude has a lot to do with it . Not so much nature and not so much " talking positively - a uniquely unsustainable approach cultivated by those on the drip fed from the taxpayer ) . What the farm will tell you each year , though if you stick with it is that sun and rain will come again forgiving the past and making a new start; not only possible but often highly productive to boot .Comes and goes like positive and negative , anger and joy , mental stress and mental relief . Maybe it isn't a an illness as the specialist on Q&A said.
Let noone say the natural world is limited without saying at the same time its most limited by the minds of men . I have published on this issue as a professional environmental risk assessor.
Recommendations to the ABC
--Was great that the ABC have got this right --- they need to get out of the way and let people talk
--The ABC and the Project are great at finding problems to talk about but they are really shit at offering solutions .Too many reporters like the thrill of naming them instead of linking. The Project is much better at it than the ABc and that's saying something . As I said to Jon Feine over ten years ago with his listeners;link us to each other and then you wouldn't create so much unresolved mental stress ( creates it by playing with the subject like Tony Jones does )
-- Programs like Bush telegraph need people with real experience and understanding of rural people . Its easy to feed lollies when mental issues require you to be aware of the medicine even if you aren't the ones to apply it - you might even invite guests like Les who hold a balance that really helps and don't dissect the person into a million broken pieces ( the legacy of those who practice at the school of mere description )